President Joe Biden’s decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden, has ignited a firestorm of debate among political figures and commentators. The move, widely criticized by both Democrats and Republicans, raises questions about the president’s motivations and the potential implications for his legacy.
During a segment on Fox News’s The Five, co-host and former judge Jeanine Pirro voiced strong opinions about the pardon. She argued that this act of clemency not only reflects poorly on the president but also highlights deeper issues surrounding Hunter Biden’s controversial business dealings and legal troubles.
Pirro began by pointing out that the pardon extended far beyond Hunter Biden’s recent legal convictions, which included charges of lying on a federal gun purchase form and failing to pay taxes. Instead, the pardon covered an 11-year period, from January 2014 to December 2024. This timeline encompasses years when Joe Biden was serving as vice president and overseeing U.S.-Ukraine relations—a period when Hunter Biden secured a lucrative position with a Ukrainian energy firm despite lacking relevant experience.
Pirro stated, “Joe Biden started out this presidency by saying, ‘I know nothing about my son’s businesses,’ and he’s ending it by lying again and pardoning his son.”
Hunter Biden’s Legal Troubles and the Scope of the Pardon
Hunter Biden’s convictions have been at the center of heated political discourse. In June, he was found guilty of lying on a federal form about his drug use while purchasing a firearm. In September, he faced nine additional counts related to his failure to pay over $1.4 million in taxes between 2016 and 2019.
Critics like Pirro argue that the president’s pardon was an attempt to shield his son from further scrutiny and potential incarceration.
“They knew that jail time was coming for Hunter Biden,” Pirro said. “He’s convicted of two felonies—not one, two. And Joe Biden has the audacity to say this was selective prosecution?”
The pardon has also drawn attention to the role of David Weiss, the special counsel overseeing Hunter Biden’s investigations. Weiss has been criticized for allowing statutes of limitations to expire on certain charges, particularly those from Hunter Biden’s highest-earning years, which some believe implicate Joe Biden and other family members.
Implications for the Biden Presidency
The decision to pardon Hunter Biden has cast a shadow over Joe Biden’s presidency, with many questioning his commitment to upholding the rule of law. Pirro and other commentators have pointed out that pardons are typically granted to individuals who have already served their sentences and shown remorse for their actions.
“This isn’t a case where someone has paid their debt to society,” Pirro argued. “We don’t even know what his sentence would have been. And for the president to claim this is about fairness and selective prosecution is absurd.”
Pirro also criticized Biden’s handling of the Justice Department, questioning why he has not taken action against Attorney General Merrick Garland if he believes the prosecution of his son was unjust.
“If the Justice Department is so selective in their prosecutions, fire the guy that you hired,” she said.
The controversy surrounding the pardon has led to broader discussions about political accountability and whether Hunter Biden has been afforded preferential treatment due to his father’s position.
A Divided Response
While Biden’s supporters argue that the pardon was a compassionate act from a father to his son, critics see it as a misuse of presidential power. The bipartisan backlash indicates that this decision may have long-term consequences for Joe Biden’s political standing and the public’s trust in his administration.
The pardon not only marks a pivotal moment in Joe Biden’s presidency but also raises pressing questions about justice, transparency, and the balance of power. Whether this move will be remembered as an act of compassion or a profound misstep remains to be seen.
WATCH:
